Jeremy C. Jones, M.D.

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of RO7198457 versus watchful waiting in patients with circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) positive, surgically resected Stage II/III rectal cancer, or Stage II (high risk)/Stage III colon cancer.

The purpose of this study is to determine the prevalence of genetic mutations in cancer patients from various ethnic populations seeking care at Mayo Clinic cancer clinics.

The purpose of this study is to develop a biorepository of blood samples  from cancer patients participating in the Gemini (IRB 19-006717) protocol. These samples will be used for future biomarker discovery and other translational studies. 

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the integration of cancer pan-genetic testing into a cancer clinical practice and understand both its use and effect in “real world” practice conditions.

The purpose of this study is to analyze the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) from Diffusion-Weighted (DWI) in patients before, during the second week of and after preoperative chemoradiation therapy for rectal cancer.

The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of irinotecan versus oxaliplatin after long-course chemoradiation in patients with stage II-III rectal cancer. Combination chemotherapy drugs, such as FOLFIRINOX (fluorouracil, irinotecan, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin), FOLFOX (leucovorin, fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan ), and CAPOX (capecitabin and oxaliplatin) work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. FOLFOX or CAPOX are used after chemoradiation as usual treatment for rectal cancer. Giving FOLFIRINOX after chemoradiation may increase the response rate and lead to higher rates of clinical complete response (with a chance of avoiding surgery) compared to FOLFOX or CAPOX after chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

The purpose of this study for the Inavo + Cetux Arm (A):  To evaluate the effectiveness of Inavo + Cetux in PIK3CA-mutated colorectal cancer (CRC) with no detected RAS (KRAS, NRAS) or BRAFV600E mutations.

The purpose of this study for the Inavo + Bev Arm (B_:  To evaluate the effectiveness Inavo + Bev in PIK3CA-mutated, RAS (KRAS, NRAS)-mutated CRC.

The purpose of this study for the Atezo+SY-5069 Arm (C): To evaluate the effectiveness of atezolizumab and SY-5609 treatment combination on patients with mCRC.

The purpose of this study for the GDC-6036+cetuzimab+FOLFOX Arm (E): To evaluate the effectivenss of GDC-6036 plus cetuximab plus FOLFOX on patients with mCRC.

The purpose of this study for the GDC-6036 plus cetuximab Arm (F): To evaluate the effectivenss of GDC-6036 plus cetuximab on patients with mCRC.

The purpose of this study for the atezolizumab plus tiragolumab or atezolizumab plus tiragolumab and bevacizumab Arm (MSI-H): To evaluate the effectivenss of atezolizumab plus tiragolumab or atezolizumab plus tiragolumab and bevacizumab.

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of fruquintinib plus best supportive care (BSC) versus placebo plus BSC in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Approximately 687 subjects will be randomized to one of the following treatment arms in a 2:1 ratio, fruquintinib plus BSC or placebo plus BSC.

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of MRTX849 administered in combination with cetuximab versus chemotherapy in the second-line treatment setting in patients with CRC with KRAS G12C mutation.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the dose, safety, immunogenicity and early clinical activity of GRT-C903 and GRT-R904, a neoantigen-based therapeutic cancer vaccine, in combination with immune checkpoint blockade, in patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, microsatellite stable colorectal cancer, pancreatic cancer, and shared neoantigen-positive tumors.

Patients in the study will be treated with Melphalan/HDS and will receive up to 6 total treatments. This study will evaluate the safety and effects of the treatment.

The goal of this study is to evaluate the integration of cancer genetic testing into a community cancer clinical practice aimed toward patients of various ethnic populations in north Florida including, but not limited to, African Americans, Hispanic/Latino, Native American/Alaskan and Asian, by self-report.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and clinical activity experience of previous studies that have evaluated ulixertinib as a novel targeted cancer treatment in cohorts of patients with specific genetic alterations and tumor histologies that result in aberrant MAPK pathway signaling. Early clinical data have demonstrated anti-tumor activity with ulixertinib treatment and have identified specific groups of patients for whom additional development is warranted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil in combination with bevacizumab versus trifluridine/tipiracil monotherapy in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

The purpose of this study is to create a database of rectal cancer cells that can be studied outside of the patient's body.

The primary objective of this study is to determine the feasibility of generating sufficient MicroOrganpSphere (MOS) from a biopsy of a patient's colorectal cancer liver metastasis to determine sensitivity to standard of care drug used in the treatment of colorectal cancer (oxaliplatin, irinotecan, 5-FU/Xeloda, Bevacizumab, Panitumumab or Cetuximab, Lonsurf, Regorafenib and Pembrolizumab or Nivolumab) in < 14 days.

The secondary objective of this study is to assess the association between standard of care drug sensitivity in MOS to clinical outcome of patient treated with standard of care therapy from which the MOS was derived.

This is a multicenter, open label, phase II trial to determine the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity and initial clinical activity of the combination treatment of PolyPEPI1018 vaccine and atezolizumab in participants with MSS CRC who have progressed on 2 or 3 prior regimens.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate how well retreatment with panitumumab works compared to standard of care regorafenib or trifluridine and tipiracil hydrochloride (TAS-102) in treating patients with colorectal cancer that is:  negative for RAS wild-type colorectal cancer and has spread to other places in the body, and/or cannot be removed by surgery, and is negative for resistance mutations in blood. Treatment with panitumumab may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Some tumors need growth factors to keep growing. Growth factor antagonists, such as regorafenib, may interfere with the growth factor and stop the tumor from growing. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as TAS-102, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Giving panitumumab may work better in treating patients with colorectal cancer than with the usual treatment of regorafenib or TAS-102.